InfrastructureCommunity Mental Health

Chicago community behavioral health

Loading…

Projected cumulative result
2025–2030[?]
 
Weighted operating margin
cohort result ÷ revenue
Grant-cliff exposure[?]
grants ÷ revenue (weighted) · IDHS/SAMHSA
Medicaid/program exposure
program revenue ÷ revenue (weighted)

Provider cohort

16 of 16 selected

16 nonprofit/CCBHC behavioral orgs (990 financials). Filter or check any combination — metrics, charts & sensitivity recompute.

Behavioral health facility directory

· SAMHSA treatment-facility census (MH/SUD/OTP + FQHC behavioral). Click a facility for detail. This directory powers the planned navigator bot.

Cohort revenue vs. expenses

Solid: actuals from IRS Form 990[?]. Dashed: COVID-controlled projection median; shaded = 80% CI (bootstrap).

Cohort weighted operating margin

Revenue-weighted margin. Reference line at 0% (break-even). Grey = COVID years, controlled out in the projection.

Methodology & caveats

What this is
16 Chicago nonprofit / CCBHC community behavioral health organizations (mental health + substance use), IRS Form 990 financials run through the same trajectory engine as the hospital and FQHC tools. Facility directory (813 sites) from the SAMHSA treatment-facility census[?].
Two exposure axes
Behavioral providers split between grant-cliff exposure (IDHS contracts, SAMHSA block grant — cut these and grant-funded orgs collapse) and Medicaid/program exposure (a Medicaid behavioral rate cut guts the fee-funded ones). Both are measured per-org from the 990, so the sensitivity engine is exposure-weighted on real data.
Limitations
990s are org-level: multiservice agencies (Metropolitan Family, Center on Halsted, Association House) file one return for everything, so behavioral health is a slice — read those margins with care. Trajectory labels default to "stable" because the −25% hospital-insolvency threshold rarely trips for thin-margin nonprofits; the fragility flag (deficit / grant-dependent / Medicaid-exposed) is the signal here.